docs: update progress tracking for subtasks 6.2 and 6.3

- Mark subtask 6.2 (mobile responsiveness) as completed
- Mark subtask 6.3 (review and refine explanations) as completed
- Add QA iteration history tracking
This commit is contained in:
2026-01-11 23:33:07 +01:00
parent a82fab5312
commit a4d61fe170
2 changed files with 143 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@@ -215,15 +215,17 @@
"id": "6.2",
"title": "Verify mobile responsiveness",
"description": "Test concept section on mobile viewports, ensure diagrams scale appropriately.",
"status": "pending",
"notes": ""
"status": "completed",
"notes": "Successfully tested concept section on mobile viewports and added responsive CSS optimizations. Implementation includes:\n- Mobile tablet (768px): Reduced diagram font-size to 0.75rem, padding to 0.75rem, added momentum scrolling\n- Small mobile (480px): Further reduced to 0.7rem font, 0.5rem padding, optimized all concept elements\n- Progressive font scaling: 0.7rem \u2192 0.75rem \u2192 0.85rem across breakpoints\n- Progressive padding reduction: 0.5rem \u2192 0.75rem \u2192 1rem across breakpoints\n- Touch-friendly features: -webkit-overflow-scrolling for iOS, horizontal scroll support\n- Maintained ASCII diagram alignment, accessibility, and RTL support\n- Zero desktop regressions, semantic HTML preserved\n- Created comprehensive test report documenting viewport testing, calculations, and UX recommendations\n- Tested across iPhone SE (320px), iPhone 12 (390px), iPad (768px), desktop (1024px+)\nCommitted: 4a8f45f",
"updated_at": "2026-01-11T14:11:14.705255+00:00"
},
{
"id": "6.3",
"title": "Review and refine explanations",
"description": "Final review of all concept texts for clarity, consistency, and beginner-friendliness. Ensure 2-4 sentence limit.",
"status": "pending",
"notes": ""
"status": "completed",
"notes": "Successfully completed final review of all concept texts. Reviewed 85+ concepts across 20+ modules. Trimmed 7 overly-long explanations in transitions-animations.json (4 lessons) and responsive.json (4 lessons) to meet 2-4 sentence guideline. All concepts now comply with requirements while maintaining clarity, beginner-friendliness, and strong WHY focus. Created comprehensive review report documenting findings and improvements. Committed changes.",
"updated_at": "2026-01-11T14:17:07.329324+00:00"
}
]
}
@@ -235,5 +237,81 @@
},
"created_at": "2025-01-11T00:00:00Z",
"updated_at": "2025-01-11T00:00:00Z",
"last_updated": "2026-01-11T14:07:06.092736+00:00"
"last_updated": "2026-01-11T14:17:07.329337+00:00",
"qa_iteration_history": [
{
"iteration": 1,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T14:22:58.766283+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json"
}
]
},
{
"iteration": 2,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T14:33:01.584469+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json"
}
]
},
{
"iteration": 3,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T14:33:06.389501+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json (No tools were used by agent)"
}
]
},
{
"iteration": 1,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T22:31:19.511170+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json (No tools were used by agent)"
}
]
},
{
"iteration": 2,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T22:31:23.545895+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json (No tools were used by agent)"
}
]
},
{
"iteration": 3,
"status": "error",
"timestamp": "2026-01-11T22:31:27.236620+00:00",
"issues": [
{
"title": "QA error",
"description": "QA agent did not update implementation_plan.json (No tools were used by agent)"
}
]
}
],
"qa_stats": {
"total_iterations": 6,
"last_iteration": 3,
"last_status": "error",
"issues_by_type": {
"unknown": 6
}
}
}