Files
librenotes/.gitea/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
T
libretechandClaude Opus 4.7 62ef8be966 Add community infrastructure: issue + PR templates, CoC
Gitea issue templates (.gitea/issue_template/):
- bug.yml: structured form requiring version, environment,
  what-happened, repro steps, expected, optional logs. Routes
  security reports to security@librete.ch instead of public
  issues.
- feature.yml: prompts for the underlying problem before the
  proposed solution, plus alternatives and out-of-scope.

Pull request template (.gitea/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md):
checklist for tests, lint, manual exercise, docs, and changelog.
Asks for explicit reviewer notes so trade-offs surface in the
PR description rather than being lost in chat.

CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md: links to Contributor Covenant 2.1 verbatim
rather than inlining; documents scope, reporting address
(conduct@librete.ch), and points enforcement at the Covenant's
own Enforcement Guidelines.

README links the docs/ tree, CONTRIBUTING, and the CoC so new
contributors find the entry points.

Closes #31.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-28 23:18:10 +02:00

553 B

Summary

What does this PR change, and why?

Linked issue

Closes #

Changes

Testing

  • make test passes locally
  • make lint passes locally
  • Added or updated tests for the changed behaviour
  • Manually exercised the affected flow (frontend / API / etc.)

Documentation

  • Updated relevant docs in docs/
  • Updated CHANGELOG.md if user-visible
  • No documentation change needed

Notes for reviewers

Anything you want a reviewer to look at specifically? Trade-offs considered? Migrations to flag?