kind: WavePipeline
metadata:
  name: ops-issue-quality
  description: "Scan open issues for quality and post enhancement suggestions on poor-scoring ones"
  release: true

skills:
  - gh-cli

requires:
  tools:
    - gh

input:
  source: cli
  example: "re-cinq/wave"
  schema:
    type: string
    description: "Repository in owner/repo format"

steps:
  - id: scan
    persona: "gitea-analyst"
    model: claude-haiku
    workspace:
      mount:
        - source: ./
          target: /project
          mode: readonly
    exec:
      type: prompt
      source: |
        Scan all open issues in the repository and produce a quality report.

        Repository: {{ input }}

        Split the input on "/" to get OWNER and REPO.

        ## Fetch Open Issues

        ```bash
        {{ forge.cli_tool }} issue list --repo {{ input }} --state open --limit 200 \
          --json number,title,body,labels,url,assignees,milestone,createdAt,updatedAt,comments
        ```

        ## Analyze Each Issue

        For every issue (skip pull requests — items where the URL contains "/pull/"), evaluate:

        1. **Title quality**
           - Too short (< 10 chars): -20 points
           - All lowercase (> 5 chars): -5 points
           - All uppercase (> 5 chars): -10 points
           - Vague terms ("issue", "problem", "help", "bug?", "question") with title < 30 chars: -10 points
           - Fewer than 3 words: -15 points

        2. **Body quality**
           - Empty body: -40 points
           - Body < 50 chars: -25 points
           - Body < 100 chars: -10 points
           - Single sentence (< 2 sentence-ending punctuation marks) with body > 20 chars: -10 points
           - No structured sections (missing keywords like "steps to reproduce", "expected behavior", "actual behavior", "environment", "version", "screenshot", "reproduction") with body > 100 chars: -5 points

        3. **Labels**
           - No labels: -10 points

        Start every issue at score 100 and apply deductions. Floor at 0.

        ## Output

        Write a JSON file to `.wave/artifacts/quality-report.json` with this structure:

        ```json
        {
          "repository": {
            "owner": "<OWNER>",
            "name": "<REPO>"
          },
          "total_issues": <count of issues fetched>,
          "analyzed_count": <count of issues analyzed (excluding PRs)>,
          "poor_quality_issues": [
            {
              "number": <issue number>,
              "title": "<issue title>",
              "body": "<issue body — truncate at 500 chars>",
              "quality_score": <0-100>,
              "problems": ["<problem description>", ...],
              "recommendations": ["<recommendation>", ...],
              "labels": ["<label name>", ...],
              "url": "<issue HTML URL>"
            }
          ],
          "quality_threshold": 70,
          "timestamp": "<ISO 8601 timestamp>"
        }
        ```

        Include ALL issues with quality_score < 70 in `poor_quality_issues`, sorted by quality_score ascending (worst first).
    output_artifacts:
      - name: quality-report
        path: .wave/artifacts/quality-report.json
        type: json
        required: true
    retry:
      policy: patient
      max_attempts: 2
    handover:
      contract:
        type: json_schema
        source: .wave/artifacts/quality-report.json
        schema_path: .wave/contracts/github-issue-analysis.schema.json
        on_failure: retry

  - id: enhance
    persona: "gitea-commenter"
    dependencies: [scan]
    memory:
      inject_artifacts:
        - step: scan
          artifact: quality-report
          as: quality_report
    workspace:
      mount:
        - source: ./
          target: /project
          mode: readonly
    exec:
      type: prompt
      source: |
        Post enhancement suggestions as comments on the worst-scoring issues.

        Repository: {{ input }}

        ## Read Quality Report

        Read the injected quality_report artifact. It contains the full quality analysis with per-issue scores, problems, and recommendations.

        ## Select Issues to Enhance

        From `poor_quality_issues`, select issues where `quality_score < 50`. Process at most 10 issues to avoid comment spam.

        If no issues have score < 50, check issues with score < 70 and select the 5 worst.

        If there are no poor quality issues at all, write a summary noting the repository has good issue quality and skip posting.

        ## Post Enhancement Comment

        For each selected issue, compose a helpful comment and post it:

        ```bash
        cat > /tmp/issue-enhance-<NUMBER>.md <<'COMMENT_EOF'
        ## Issue Quality Suggestions

        This issue has been automatically reviewed for clarity and completeness.

        **Quality Score**: <score>/100

        **Problems identified**:
        <bulleted list of problems>

        **Recommendations**:
        <bulleted list of recommendations>

        Consider updating this issue with the suggestions above to help maintainers triage and implement it more effectively.

        ---
        *Posted by [Wave](https://github.com/re-cinq/wave) ops-issue-quality pipeline*
        COMMENT_EOF
        {{ forge.cli_tool }} issue comment <NUMBER> --repo {{ input }} --body-file /tmp/issue-enhance-<NUMBER>.md
        ```

        Clean up temp files after posting each comment.

        ## Write Summary

        After processing all issues, write `.wave/artifacts/enhancement-summary.md` with:

        1. **Repository**: owner/repo
        2. **Issues Scanned**: total count
        3. **Poor Quality Issues**: count below threshold
        4. **Comments Posted**: count and issue numbers
        5. **Skipped**: count of issues not commented on and reason (score >= 50, or batch limit reached)
        6. For each commented issue: number, title, score, and a brief note on the main problems addressed
    output_artifacts:
      - name: enhancement-summary
        path: .wave/artifacts/enhancement-summary.md
        type: markdown
        required: true
    retry:
      policy: standard
      max_attempts: 2
    handover:
      contract:
        type: non_empty_file
        source: .wave/artifacts/enhancement-summary.md